Submissions

Author Guidelines

The article is a paper of the research result of English Education, English Literature, or English Linguistics (field of research) that has never been published by other online and print media.

       1. Topics reviewed include the study of Research on English Education, English Literature or English Linguistics

2. Authors are lecturers, observers, practitioners, researchers, teachers.
3. Articles are written in standard English with font: Times New Roman with 12 pt in size, a spacing of 1.5 spaces (abstract: 1 space) on A4 paper (page setup: Top (4 cm), Bottom (3 cm), Left (4 cm), Right (3 cm) and sent to the editor in the form of the soft copy at the e-mail address: etjartbi@gmail.com
4. Length of writing between 10-25 pages, excluding Bibliography.
5. Eligible articles will be selected and edited by the Editorial Team for uniform format and style of writing, without changing the substance.
6. The name of the article author (without an academic degree or position) is listed with a correspondence address, and/or email address, and/or mobile phone number.
7. Articles in the form of library research include title, name, and identity of the author, abstract in English with 200 words, keywords, introduction, content or discussion, conclusion and suggestion, and bibliography.
8. Articles in the form of field research include the title, name, and identity of the author, abstract in English with 200-250 Word, keywords, introduction (problem, purpose, and benefit of research), research method, findings and discussion, conclusion/conclusion and suggestion, and references.
9. Keywords can be words or phrases.
10. The writing of footnotes and bibliography is different. The difference can be seen in the following example: footnote is one of three writing texts that serve to mark the identity of the data source. Besides footnote can also be used to provide additional information about a subject or issue that is impossible to explain in the body of the text but is still closely related to the issues discussed. Such an explanation should be placed in the footnote, otherwise will interfere with the flow of discussion. In addition to footnotes, against two other writing techniques, the endnotes and the middle notes. In principle, the footnotes and endnotes are no different, except only in the location. The footnote is located at the bottom of the text body, while the endnote is on the back of each chapter or at the end of the book. The middle note is a note placed directly at the end of the post (entered in the text body). In comparison with the endnotes, the footnote is more practical, because the reader can immediately know the identity of the source mentioned on the same page with the quotation because it's a scientific work that tends to use more footnotes compared to the other two models. With such considerations, the footnotes were chosen as a technique that is treated in the activities of ETJaR articles.

The source of the book
¹ Jeremy Hammer, The practice of English language teaching (London : Longman, 2002), 22.

Source from translated book
¹ Michel Foucault, Arkeologi Pengetahuan, translated by Muchtar Zoerni (Yogyakarta : Qalam, 2002), 11.

The source of a book written by more than one author
¹ J.S. Colemen et. al, Equality of Education Opportunity (Washington: US. Government Printing Office, 1966), 15.

The source of the articles in the book
¹ Jajat Burhanudin, Arkeologi dan Kajian Islam di Indonesia dalam Menemukan Peradaban Hasan Muarif Ambary (ed.)  (Jakarta : Logos Wacana Ilmu, 1998), 12.

The source of the book consists of several volumes
¹ V.L.Parrington, Main Current in American Thought, vol. 2 (New York: An Arbor Press, 1970), 18.
² Harun Nasution, Islam Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Aspeknya, vol.1 (Jakarta : UI Press, 1972), 23.

Sources from articles in scientific journals and magazines
¹ M. Rofiq Al-Amien, Fundamentalisme Islam dalam Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, Journal of Islamica, Year IV, Number 2 (March 2004), 34.
² Richard Thomas, Menguak Abad Baru Hijrah di Eropa, Magazine of Panji Masyarakat, Year XII, Number 314 (February, 1981), 19.

Sources of unpublished research results (Thesis, Thesis, Dissertation)
¹ Bisri afandi, Shaikh Ahmad al-Shurkati: His Role in Al-Irshad Movement,” (Thesis of MA., MeGill Universitu, Montreal, 1976), 34.
² Munawir, Pendidikan Moral dalam Perspektif Hamka (Thesis, Magister Program of IAIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya, 2000), 7.
³ Nur Syam, Islam Pesisir (Dissertation, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 2002), 31.

Sources of unpublished research reports, whether individual research or collective research
¹ Surjo Sumarsono, Saran Untuk Memperbaiki Pendidikan Jasmani, Unpublished research report (Bandung : UPI, 1990), 20.

Sources from the interview
¹ Sholahudin Wahid, Pengasuh Pondok Pesantren Tebuireng, personal interview, Jombang, 21 April 2009.

The source of the writing (entry) in an encyclopedia.
¹ A.J. Wensi, The First Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. M. Th. Houtsman, et. al. (leiden: E.J. Brill, 1987) Vol. 7, 234
² Iskandar, Islam dan Kolonialisme, Ensiklopedi Tematis Dunia Islam, vol. 5(Jakarta : Ichtiar Baru van Hoeven, 2002), 31.

Sources from articles on websites or e-mail
¹Aqida Swamurti, Skandal Plagiarisme, Menteri Pertahanan Jerman Mundur, dalam http://www.tempointeraktif.com/share/?act=TmV3cw ... Accessed on 10 Maret 2011.² Roger Jones, Moral Phiolosophy, dalam http://www.philosophy.org.uk/ moral.htm, accessed on 10 Mei

Sources include regulations (UUD, UU, Kepres, PP, Permendiknas, Kepmen dsb)
¹ Undang-undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen (Jakarta : Asa Mandiri, 2006), 8.footnote

(footnote) is the same with the source on it directly, then used the word Ibid.
¹al Ghazaly, Ihya' Ulumuddin, juz 2 (Mesir : Darul Kutub, 1979), 6.²Ibid., 71.

Footnote (footnote) same with about source but not directly (Op.cit)
¹V.L.Parrington, Main Current in American Thought, vol. 2 (New York: An Arbor Press, 1970), 17.²Al Ghazaly, Ihya' Ulumuddin, juz 2 (Mesir: Darul Kutub, 1979), 6.³V.L.Parrington, Op. Cit, 86.

Footnote (footnote) similar to the above source but not directly and as high as 2 other sources or more (Loc. cit)
¹V.L.Parrington, Main Current in American Thought, vol. 2 (New York: An Arbor Press, 1970), 17.
²Al Ghazaly, Ihya' Ulumuddin, juz 2 (Mesir : Darul Kutub, 1979), 6.
³Muh. Iskandar, Islam dan Kolonialisme, Ensiklopedi Tematis Dunia Islam, vol. 5 (Jakarta : Ichtiar Baru van Hoeven, 2002), 31.
⁴V.L.Parrington, Loc. Cit, 86.

Examples of Bibliography
Source Writing Techniques in Bibliography are basically the same as not technically writing footnotes. The writing of footnotes can be sorted as follows: First, write the name of the author/reply, ie by writing the last name (Last Name) and comma, followed by the complete initial name (Frist Name) and then second and so on (if any) and ending with a dot. Second, write the title of the book in italics and followed by a dot. Three, Write the name of the box where the source/book is published and followed by a colon (:). Fourth, Write the name of the publisher, comma and year published, then the point.

Ash-Shiddieqy, Hasbi. Kriteria Antran Sunnah dan Bid'ah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1976
Hamalik, Oemar. Pengajaran Unit Studi Kurikulum dan Metodologi. Bandung: Alummni, 1982
______, Administrasi dan Supervisi Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung Mandar Maju, 1992
Soetopo, Hendiyat dan Wasty Saeoemanto. Pembinaan dan Pengembagang Kurikulum Sebagai Subtansi Problem Administrasi Pendidikaa. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1986
Slamet dkk. Management Peningkatan Mutu Berbasi Sekolah (MPMBS). Jakarta: Depdiknas, 2001.12